Abstract:

Practitioners were asked to produce changes in the pH and PPM of pH normalized water in a period of 10 minutes. A sub-group of practitioners tested produced results in conflict with normal material science expectations, which would show changes in pH linked to changes in PPM. The experiment was run with a group of naive practitioners (who had never done the exercise tested) to see if they might produce significant effects. (IRB approval NFFEH 10-8-20-6) Study was done on 69 “naive” energy practitioners to determine frequency of the occurrence and rule out other potential causes that would account for unusual data.

Purpose:

To determine if energy practitioners who are untrained in the physical manipulation of water can produce changes in pH and PPM that correlate or are different from current physics and material science understanding, and also to determine at what rate this occurs in a random population.

Materials:

The data were collected at several different sites with city tap water or bottled water that was available. Water was then normalized (left out to acclimate for 24 hours to local environmental conditions). Glass containers had been sterilized. pH Test powder was used to confirm accuracy of pH meters. Digital TDS Meters 3 Water Quality Tester which has a range of 0-990ppm and an accuracy of +/-2% and pH meters made by RoHS PHTester PH-107 Pocket Sized Digital pH Meter has a range: 0.0 – 14.0 and a resolution 0.1pH and is accurate +0.1pH were used to test the water.

Methods:

Each practitioner had a minimum of three years in professional practice as an energy practitioner. All were asked if they had ever practiced or been tested changing the pH of water. Glass jars and associated glass containers were filled with pH normal water (tested to confirm.) The containers were open for minutes 12 hours prior to testing, then tested again. Meters used in the tests were calibrated according to manufacturers’ instructions. Jars were distributed to each chair at a table. One to eight participants were tested at a time depending on environment. Participants used the same pH meter and PPM meter for each test, and meters were allowed to dry for 10 minutes between tests. Baseline tests were done and test results were written on the score sheets for each participant. Practitioners could then place their hands on the outside of glass containers or anywhere next to the glass container and could use a rolling wave to affect the water. Practitioners were cautioned not to breathe or cough into the container or they would be stopped. Additionally, they were told not to put their hands over the open top of the water container. At the end of 10 minutes the water was tested again for both pH and PPM and the data recorded.

Results:

All practitioners made a change in either pH or PPM that was past significance…